Gamma Knife vs LINAC and Proton Therapy: Source, Availability and Size Limits Compared
By Ruth Alderman | Medically reviewed by Mr Edward Halloran, FRCS (SN)
Published May 1, 2026 · Last reviewed May 6, 2026 · 4 min read
Key takeaways
- All three deliver stereotactic radiosurgery; the difference is the radiation source: Gamma Knife uses cobalt-60 gamma rays, LINAC systems (Novalis, TrueBeam) use X-ray photons, and proton therapy uses charged particles.
- LINAC-based SRS treats brain lesions up to about 3.5 cm and is more widely available than Gamma Knife, because a general radiotherapy department can adapt a linear accelerator it already owns.
- Gamma Knife treats intracranial targets only and converges its 192 beams to an accuracy of under about 0.5 mm, which is why it remains a reference standard for small, awkward brain targets.
- Proton therapy stops sharply at a set depth (the Bragg peak), sparing tissue beyond the target; it is scarce, expensive and used more for select tumours than for routine brain radiosurgery.
- For a target that qualifies for radiosurgery, the platform matters less than the plan; what decides the outcome is the target's size, position and the dose, not the brand of machine.
Gamma Knife, LINAC-based systems (such as Novalis and TrueBeam) and proton therapy all deliver stereotactic radiosurgery; what separates them is the radiation source: Gamma Knife uses cobalt-60 gamma rays, LINAC systems use X-ray photons, and proton therapy uses charged particles. All three focus a high dose onto a target while sparing the tissue around it, and all three are non-invasive. The practical differences are the source, how widely available each is, and the size of target each can treat1.
When I was choosing where to have my acoustic neuroma treated, I assumed the machine with the sharpest name was the one to want. It took a patient conversation with the physicist to understand that these are three ways of solving the same problem, each with a different tool, and that for a small, well-seen target the choice mattered far less than I feared. This article sets out the real differences. For the machine at the centre of this site, start with Gamma Knife radiosurgery; for the category all three belong to, see what is stereotactic radiosurgery.
What is the difference between Gamma Knife, LINAC and proton therapy?
The core difference is the radiation source and how the beam reaches the target: Gamma Knife uses fixed cobalt-60 gamma sources, a LINAC produces X-ray photons and moves the beam around the head, and proton therapy fires charged particles that stop at a chosen depth. Gamma Knife focuses about 192 individually weak cobalt-60 beams so they converge on one point, meeting to an accuracy of under about 0.5 mm; older units used 201 sources1. A LINAC (linear accelerator) accelerates electrons to make X-rays, then sweeps that single beam through arcs around your head so the dose builds up at the target. Proton therapy uses positively charged particles instead of photons.
The word radiosurgery describes the single high dose these deliver; when the same idea is split into a few sessions it is called stereotactic radiotherapy2. For the physics of the cobalt-60 approach in plain terms, see how Gamma Knife works.
How does LINAC-based radiosurgery (Novalis, TrueBeam) compare with Gamma Knife?
LINAC-based SRS uses X-rays rather than cobalt-60, treats brain lesions up to about 3.5 cm, and is more widely available than Gamma Knife. A linear accelerator is a general radiotherapy machine that many hospitals already own for everyday cancer treatment and can adapt for stereotactic work, which is why systems branded Novalis or TrueBeam are found in more centres than dedicated Gamma Knife units1. Because the LINAC is not built solely for the brain, the same class of machine can also treat the body and spine.
The trade-off is precision at the smallest scale. Gamma Knife’s fixed array converges to under about 0.5 mm, which is part of why it remains a reference standard for tiny targets sitting next to a nerve or vessel. In practice both platforms deliver a comparable radiation effect to a target that suits them, and the single-session size limit is similar across platforms, roughly 3 to 3.5 cm (about 10 to 15 cc in volume)3. Above that, the target is usually treated with surgery or fractionated. For the robotic, frameless cousin of the LINAC, see Gamma Knife versus CyberKnife; for whether your target even qualifies, see am I a candidate for Gamma Knife.
How does proton therapy compare with Gamma Knife?
Proton therapy uses charged particles that release most of their energy at a set depth, the Bragg peak, and then stop, so almost no dose is deposited beyond the target; it is scarce, expensive, and used more for selected tumours than for routine brain radiosurgery. With X-rays and gamma rays, some dose continues past the target as the beam exits the far side. Protons behave differently: they can be tuned to stop at the tumour, which can spare structures directly behind it4. That property is valued for tumours close to sensitive tissue and in children, where limiting the total dose to the developing brain matters.
The catch is availability and cost. Proton centres are large, few in number, and costly to build and run, so proton therapy is not a routine alternative for the small brain targets Gamma Knife commonly treats. For the everyday brain lesions on this site, such as those covered in Gamma Knife for brain tumours, it is Gamma Knife and LINAC-based SRS that are the usual candidates, with proton therapy reserved for particular cases.
Which platform is right for which target?
The platform matters less than the plan: the target’s size, position and the dose decide the outcome, not the brand of machine. As a rule of thumb, single-session radiosurgery on any of these platforms suits targets around 3 to 3.5 cm or smaller; LINAC-based SRS is generally described up to about 3.5 cm1. The differences that guide the choice are:
- Source and reach: Gamma Knife uses cobalt-60 and treats the brain only; LINAC uses X-rays and can also treat the body and spine; proton therapy uses charged particles and stops at a set depth.
- Availability: LINAC-based systems are the most widely available, because they adapt machines hospitals already have; Gamma Knife units are dedicated and fewer; proton centres are the rarest of all.
- Precision at the smallest scale: Gamma Knife’s sub-millimetre convergence keeps it a reference standard for tiny, awkwardly placed brain targets.
- Sparing tissue beyond the target: proton therapy’s Bragg peak can spare structures directly behind the tumour, which is why it is chosen for select sensitive cases.
National guidance frames stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy by the clinical situation rather than by a single preferred machine, leaving the platform choice to the team treating you5. In my case the target was small and intracranial, and Gamma Knife was chosen because it was the most precise tool available for exactly that job, not because it was inherently superior to the others. For the broader set of choices, see Gamma Knife versus surgery, Gamma Knife versus whole-brain radiotherapy, and the honest list in questions to ask before Gamma Knife.
References
- Stereotactic Radiosurgery, American Association of Neurological Surgeons. ↩
- Stereotactic radiotherapy for brain and spinal cord tumours, Cancer Research UK. ↩
- Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS), Cleveland Clinic. ↩
- Proton therapy, Mayo Clinic. ↩
- Brain tumours (primary) and brain metastases in over 16s (NG99), NICE. ↩
Common questions
What is the difference between Gamma Knife and LINAC radiosurgery?
The main difference is the radiation source. Gamma Knife uses about 192 fixed cobalt-60 sources emitting gamma rays that converge on a brain target to an accuracy of under about half a millimetre. A LINAC (linear accelerator), such as a Novalis or TrueBeam, produces X-ray photons and moves the beam around the head. Gamma Knife treats intracranial targets only; LINAC systems can also treat the body and spine, and they treat brain lesions up to about 3.5 cm.
Is proton therapy better than Gamma Knife?
Neither is simply better; they suit different jobs. Proton therapy uses charged particles that stop at a set depth, the Bragg peak, so almost no dose is deposited beyond the target. That can matter for tumours near sensitive structures or in children. Gamma Knife remains a reference standard for small, well-defined brain targets, delivering a high dose with sub-millimetre precision in a single day. Proton centres are scarce and costly, so proton therapy is not a routine substitute for brain radiosurgery.
How big a tumour can LINAC-based radiosurgery treat?
LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery generally treats brain lesions up to about 3.5 cm. This is close to the single-session radiosurgery limit across platforms, which is roughly 3 to 3.5 cm (about 10 to 15 cc in volume). Larger targets are usually treated with surgery, or by splitting the dose over several sessions (stereotactic radiotherapy).
Why is LINAC radiosurgery more widely available than Gamma Knife?
Because a Gamma Knife is a dedicated machine that does only intracranial radiosurgery, whereas a LINAC is a general radiotherapy machine that many hospitals already own for everyday cancer treatment and can adapt for stereotactic work. That means more centres can offer LINAC-based SRS without buying a single-purpose unit, which is why the American Association of Neurological Surgeons notes it is more widely available.
Do Gamma Knife, LINAC and proton give the same radiation dose to the target?
The biological effect at the target can be comparable when the plan is done well; the differences lie in the source, the beam geometry and how the dose falls away outside the target. Gamma Knife and LINAC both deposit their dose as photons pass through tissue, while protons deposit most of theirs at a set depth and stop. The team chooses the platform and dose to fit your target's size and position, not the other way around.
Does Gamma Knife use radiation or X-rays?
Gamma Knife uses gamma rays from cobalt-60, a radioactive source, rather than the X-rays produced by a linear accelerator. Both are forms of high-energy photon radiation and both are used to treat, but they are generated differently: cobalt-60 emits gamma rays as it decays, while a LINAC accelerates electrons to produce X-rays on demand.
Written by Ruth Alderman. Medically reviewed by Mr Edward Halloran, FRCS (SN).
Our guides are written from personal experience and reviewed by a qualified clinician for accuracy. Read our editorial policy.